Using chronological age provides a means to roughly assure the equivalence of such factors as physical experience, social interaction, learning, and acculturation among others. Chronological age is not necessarily a predictor of an individual's stages of development, as the rate at which individual's progress through stages may not be identical. Problems in using chronological age include such issues as school readiness and the evaluation of premature infants. As medical technology has advanced in the treatment of premature infants, chronological age has been challenged as an appropriate measure for this group with gestational age or durational pregnancy being proposed as a means of adjusting chronological age.
See also: DEVELOPMENTAL NORMS; STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
Bibliography
du Toit, M. K. "A Life-Span Developmental Orientation: The Relevance of Chronological Age in Life-Span Developmental Psychology: A Theoretical Observation." South African Journal of Psychology 22 (1992):21-26
Kraemer, Helena, Anneliese Korner, and Shelley Horwitz. "AModel for Assessing the Development of Preterm Infants as a Function of Gestational, Conceptual, or Chronological Age." Developmental Psychology 21 (1985):806-812.
Kenneth F. McPherson
User Comments Add a comment…
about 1 year ago
one of the gerontological studies is the reasons for aging some scientists refere those reasons to mistakes in transfering the dna of each sell to the replaced cell and at last the old age and death occured. I beleave that there a predetermened changes in the dna during the life of the human being and also in all living creatures.